Liste des Groupes | Revenir à m android |
On 2025-06-27 08:57, Arno Welzel wrote:But any 2-door car is always "inferior" to a car with 4 doors!Marion, 2025-06-26 17:51:Because it is a matter of choice, people choose whatever is best for their use case.
>On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 10:51:46 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote :>
>
>Writing again the quoting you removed:>
>
]
]> So a phone w/o an aux jack is *always* an inferior phone to one with it.
]> (all else being equal)
Carlos,
>
I am trying to be nice when I say you can't say logic is wrong.
>
There are X number of things a phone with the aux jack can do.
There are fewer than X number of things a phone without it can do.
Correct.
>
But that's mostly irrelevant, since there are many people out there who
just don't need these things.
>
If *all* people would *need* an aux jack in a smartphone, they would
never buy devices without it. But this is not the case - iPhones are
still sold in big numbers as well as many Android phones without an aux
jack.
>
It seems, people are fine with inferior phones. Since the don't need the
superior functions. Similar to the fact, that not everybody needs a big
station wagon even if that is superior to the small car and can do
things, you can't do with the small car.
For example, a small car is useful in European busy cities, can be parked in small spaces, while a big car is impossible. May be impossible to maneuver inside some old parking lots! :-D
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.