Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025

On 2025-07-03 08:55, badgolferman wrote:

Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

On 2025-07-02 04:18, Alan wrote:

On 2025-07-01 14:46, Marion wrote:

On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 15:45:35 -0400, -hh wrote :
>
>

Absolutely. I agree. Nothing wrong, per se, with a "B" score.

>
Which means that your claim (still quoted above) that Apple has
"dismally failed in efficiency." is a flat-out lie.

>
You can take it as a lie but I said very clearly the iPhone earned a B.
I said all the Android OEMs earned an A rating. And a G was really bad.
>

Because Apple advertises they're more "efficient".
And yet, they're not.

>
Incorrect:  they've merely not achieved the highest possible score on
this particular benchmark test that happens to be used in the EU.

>
I knew iPhones would fare dismally simply because of the crappy
batteries.

>
And the lying continues.
>
A "B" score on an A-G scale...
>
...isn't dismal.

>
Absolutely correct.
>

 Is it just the word “dismal” you object to or are you dismissing the fact
that Apple batteries are inferior because a B grade is better than a C or D
grade?
 

What objective evidence have you seen that "Apple batteries are inferior"?
And I object to the word "dismal", because a grade of "B" on an A-G scale doesn't match the definition of the word.
You agree with that factual assessment, right?
:-)