Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025

Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 03:20:14 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote :
 
 

You don't like the word dismal?
 
Then pick any word you like for Apple lying to you about iPhone efficiency.
 
Deceitful... duplicitous... despicable... dishonest... disassembling...
deceptive... discrepant...

 
Dishonest. You, that is, for using those words dishonestly.

 
I'm always stating facts, and the fact is the iPhone earned a B.
Meanwhile, plenty of Android's earned an A.

Many were also graded far lower.

Those are just facts.
Apple zealots may dislike those facts, but they're still facts.

The facts are no iphone is rated below a B. Plenty of Androids are.

When you tie those facts into Apple's advertising,

Which you've never substantiated. Like all your other claims.

And yet, that efficiency doesn't exist, right?

Wrong.

Certainly the iPhone not more efficient than the Android models that I had
listed, all of which earned an A,

You're conflating your obsession of batteries with the overall grading
scheme which covers five aspects. Only two of which relate to the battery.

An A vs B comparison may have *nothing* to do with the battery, but
something else completely.