Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025

On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 17:14:25 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

The point isn't that a twenty-dollar Android couldn't earn an A, Chris.
The point is APPLE couldn't earn an A.

 
Did you even read their report? They quite easily could have graded their
phones as A, but chose not to due to the ambiguity of the test results.

Jesus Christ, Chris. I already talked about that at length.
Why is it that you get nothing the first, second or even the third time.

I said it was brilliant, Chris, for Apple to cast aspersions on a process
that they themselves had approved, agreed upon and knew about for years.

You're like MAGA people when Trump lost the election in an election process
that everyone had agreed is the election - and then - when Trump lost - he
cries the election process was rigged - casting aspersions on the whole
process.

What they did was try to find something, anything - it didn't matter what -
such as people putting boxes on the floor - and then they cast aspersions
on the whole process by "proving people put boxes on the floor".

What Apple is doing is no different, Chris, which is why you are MAGA.
You're repeating Apple's baseless aspersions as if they are truth.

Apple didn't say which (of the scores, hundreds, maybe even thousands) of
tests that they "voluntarily downgraded", but by NOT mentioning which, they
cast aspersions on the whole process - just because they lost the election.

You don't see that because you're MAGA Chris, but there's nobody
intelligent who doesn't see it since Apple didn't state WHAT they
downgraded. Hell, they could have not liked the fonts for Christ's sake.

We *know* Apple truncated the brand-new endurance scores, so now that gives
them the backing to say they "voluntarily downgraded" them, but I already
ran the math on 20 Samsung models, 5 Google models & 19 Apple models.

Even though Apple alone truncated the endurance, it makes no difference in
the average, Chris. Which is the main point of why Apple is so brilliant.

You and the rest of the uneducated MAGA Apple trolls believe Apple when
they say they don't like the fonts so EVERYTHING - by association - is
wrong - just like Rudy Guiliani did - but it's BS, Chris. You are MAGA.

These are facts:
a. Apple alone couldn't earn an A in efficiency.
b. Apple declared they didn't like the fonts (or whatever they didn't say)
c. Because Apple didn't like fonts, Apple says the whole process is rigged

While it's clever marketing, it's not only absurd for you to fall for it,
but it's duplicitous since Apple was part of the process all along.

It's no different than MAGA people saying the election was rigged.

When you tie those facts into Apple's advertising,

 
Which you've never substantiated. Like all your other claims.

 
Jesus Christ Chris. You and Alan Baker must be the only two people on this
planet who have never heard Apple's oft-touted claims of efficiency.

 
Hardly.

Chris,
What makes you an uneducated ignorant Apple troll is that you can't look up
anything. You are in the same category as Alan Baker is.

You dispute everything.
Yet you know nothing.

But worse, you look up nothing.
That's why you are what you are.

 

Do you want me to substantiate that the sun comes up in the morning, Chris?

 
I can understand why you're going for hyperbole. You are getting caught
out.

Jesus Christ. You're seriously claiming that you're completely ignorant of
what Apple has been touting for at least a decade for the iPhone, Chris?

Seriously?

Anyone that ignorant has no right whatsoever to declare ANYTHING false.
 

Look for an efficiency rating of A, Chris.
It doesn't exist.

 
It doesn't exist for *any* phone, numbnuts. Efficiency is not part of the
EU rating.
 
This Apple battery efficiency claim is simply a fever dream of yours.

Huh? Did you read the explanation of the ratings Chris?
They use the word "efficiency" in those explanations.

Seriously, you worry me. Not so much your ignorance as all Apple trolls are
ignorant. Nor so much as you can't look anything up. As that's MAGA of you.

But you dispute what NOBODY intelligent would dispute, Chris.
It's what makes you the MAGA Apple troll that you are.

Hint: You'll be shocked. Shocked I say. At how well Apple did.

 
Doubt it.

Actually, if you look at only smartphones, and if you remove tablets, Apple
did surprisingly well. Notice I proved that. Because I'm all about facts.

Samsung kicked the pants off of Apple in tablets; but not in iPhones.
Fancy that.

I'm all about facts.
You're MAGA. I'm not.