Sujet : Re: Good news: Apple finally stopped putting garbage RAM in the iPhone
De : ithinkiam (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 04. Jun 2025, 08:36:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101ot1g$mms5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.6 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Marion <
marion@facts.com> wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 07:23:48 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :
Maybe you need a refresher course in arithmetic.
Doubtful. From you? Impossible.
You make this mistake of basic arithmetic a lot, Chris, given you claimed
the 30K subunit size of the SARS-COV-2 viral genome was not huge for what
it was. Remember that? I do. You have no idea about mathematical concepts.
You still store about that? Get over it. SARS-CoV-2 isn't even large for an
RNA virus. lol.
You need a basic refresher course in arithmetic.
A 1% increase in efficiency does not overcome a 100% decrease in capacity.
My free (~180MSRP at the time) Samsung Galaxy A32-5G, which was born in
2021,
Born?! Who were its proud parents?
The EU regs require that a battery retains a minimum 80% of its capacity
for at least 1000 cycles. It doesn't matter whether that 80% is 8000 or 800
mAh nor that the 1000 cycles take two years or two weeks of typical usage.
All scenarios are equally compliant.
No Chris.
Are you now denying the very EU regs you've been fawning over?
I repeat the argument that you do not understand, and if you want to
discuss this mathematical argument, please do so as an adult would Chris.
You've made no maths argument. Come back with a fully formulated equation.