Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à m ipad 
Sujet : Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence)
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.advocacy misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.sys.mac.apps
Date : 21. Jul 2024, 03:01:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <645882704.743219657.314271.recscuba_google-huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-07-20 11:07:59 +0000, -hh said:
 
On 7/19/24 11:09 PM, Andrew wrote:
"Meanwhile, all of those benefits are available on Android and have been
since Google introduced the idea of an AI-first smartphone in October 2024
during the Pixel 8 launch. With Google's Pixel 9 family due to be announced
in August, Apple's iPhone will be two generations behind Android's AI
efforts before it has even left the Cupertino stage."
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2024/07/18/apple-iphone-16-pro-max-apple-intelligence-ai-sales-demand-new-iphone/
 
 
 
What do you expect from a company whose advertising budget dwarfs R&D.
 
But how does it actually matter how far someone is "behind" when the
shiny new widget still isn't all that great, and doesn't actually
reliably provide meaningful productivity gains?
uttinf
Case in point, AI asked to render salmon swimming upstream:
 
 
<https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/yijd3c/they_asked_an_ai_engine_to_recreate_a_salmon/>
 
>
 
Ignoring the fact that AI is utterly useless and nothing more than
another fad  gimmick ...

Well, it may be a fad .. or perhaps not (at least for certain niches).
Real point is that it is still formative and immature today.


Apple has a tendency to come in "late" and leapfrog
everyone else with a much better version. When the iPhone was
released, everyone else had to quickly play catch-up and lazily
copied the iPhone (and many still do) with a sub-quality knock-off.

Pretty much what I was alluding to:  having an “early lead” to market when
the tech change hasn’t adequately matured isn’t really worth that much: 

thus, it is  far wiser to let it continue to mature without putting its
warts out on public display where it can only created a poor opinion of it:
use that developmental time to find where it actually makes a difference
(eg productivity) before commercially launching it .. which is yes, pretty
typical of how Apple tends to operate.


-hh




Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal