Re: did this group die?

On 07/11/2024 15:50, Andrews wrote:

Chris wrote on Wed, 6 Nov 2024 18:08:19 -0000 (UTC) :
 

In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

>
He won't believe you in the same way he didn't believe me.

 Your response tells me more about your "education" than you may
realize, Chris.

I'm only responding directly to you here as you're making things up about me.

Remember - I have a good memory of your actions.

Nowhere near as good as you think.

 Remember you ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in immunological reference?
And yet, it's an extremely common word every biologist is well aware of.
 Because a biologist has taken a few basic classes in immunology, Chris.
But not you.

I'm not a biologist. I do know what you said was incorrect, however. I can't find the actual post which makes me think you misrememberd the discussion.

Why have you never taken even a single class in fundamental immunology?
And yet, you claim to own a doctorate in the medical sciences, Chris.

I didn't claim that. You misremembered, again.

How is that even possible?
 Remember you also ridiculed the commonly known assessment that 30,000
subunits as being large for a non-living SARS-COV-2 viral particle?

That didn't happen. Again, you misremembered.
https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/5IMIq4-dxhQ/m/QR1uiuFcCQAJ
 > For reason probably unknown to you, DNA mutations are less frequent than RNA
 > and this is an RNA virus (although the adenovirus used in the shots isn't).
 >
 > I've read a few papers on the mutations, where my assessment is twofold:
 > a. The mutations that _matter_ are actually rather rare for SARC-CoV2
 > b. However the RNA ball is fantastically huge so mutations _will_ happen
I corrected you in that the "RNA ball" is not huge. Viruses have tiny genomes. RNA viruses are smaller than DNA viruses, which are smaller than bacterial genomes, which are smaller than eukaryotic (like plants and mammals) genomes.
Even this paper on viruses says so.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093846/

Given you claimed a doctorate in the medical sciences, you could never have
earned that degree without at least one course in genetics,

You don't understand UK PhDs. We don't sit classes or courses. It's all pure research. And just because someone may have a PhD in, say, population health (a medical science) doesn't mean you know about molecular biology, genetics or immunology.
However, I did do genetics as part of my UG.

and yet, your
response tells me instantly that you know nothing about genetics, Chris.
 Why haven't you taken even a single basic course in genetics, Chris?
I know the answer - but I want *YOU* to answer that question for us, Chris.
 It's what you write, Chris - that informs me most about your "education".

Your photos of books tell us all about the reality of your "degrees". You also think youtube is a valid source. lol.