Liste des Groupes | Revenir à m ipad |
Chris wrote on Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:43:09 +0000 :
I corrected you in that the "RNA ball" is not huge. Viruses have tiny
genomes. RNA viruses are smaller than DNA viruses, which are smaller
than bacterial genomes, which are smaller than eukaryotic (like plants
and mammals) genomes.
The fact remains that you ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in immunology,
and
you claimed that a RNA viral genome of the SARS-COV-2 size was smaller in
comparison to other viruses.
Both are preposterous statements by you.
I don't care that you make absurd assessments, Chris. The fact you do that
simply proves me right when I assess all you Apple trolls as uneducated.
Even this paper on viruses says so.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093846/
I've always wondered if you Apple trolls even *read* your own cites, Chris.
That paper says *exactly* what I have been saying all along, and which you
had said was wrong - and yet - that paper shows *exactly* what I said.
This is a direct quote about RNA viral genomes from that very paper, Chris.
"viruses exhibit a wide diversity of genome sizes. RNA viruses
possess genomes that are universally small, ranging from 1,682
nucleotides (nt) (hepatitis delta virus [Deltavirus]) to 31,526
nt (murine hepatitis virus [Coronaviridae])."
Clue by four: 30K subunits is big for an RNA viral particle, Chris.
Very big.
The fact you don't understand the paper is consistent with all the Apple
trolls never understanding anything slightly complex - you prove me right.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.