Sujet : Re: cpu-x
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 07. May 2024, 00:00:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <5mki3j93um0k1hghpjbda84qqpgtf3odqs@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <
nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 5/6/2024 2:43 PM, vallor wrote:
On Mon, 06 May 2024 14:29:47 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<ib8i3jpsn8qgcsl4l3a5lin9lan9men5t1@4ax.com>:
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>
https://imgur.com/tpY1als
>
I got that easily with Mint Software Manager. Works very well. DFS
is easily impressed.
I don't think there was anything in his pretty gui that couldn't
be sussed-out through the Linux command line -- either by examining
/proc or /sys; or running tools like dmidecode, cpuid, lscpu, or lsmem
(to name a few).
>
Hours if not days of combing thru command-line output to assemble what
HWiNFO for Windows shows in 2 seconds, in a perfect and easily navigated
layout.
>
Have you checked out the 6,646-line hobbyware mess that 'hwinfo' gives you?
>
* the CPU info is printed twice (in v21.72 anyway), lines 128 and 1169.
>
* the tty devices in udevinfo are listed like so:
>
tty49
tty5
tty50
>
* not one mention of motherboards? wtf?
>
* it says I have a 3.5" floppy installed
>
>
That's what happens when 18 contributors aren't reined in, and the hobby
project has no defined goals. And it long ago should've been made into
an ncurses or gtk app with a minimal GUI.
>
The entire GuhNoo/Linux bizarro world can't compete with the one
Slovakian commercial developer that created HWiNFO for Windows.
CPU-X does what your utility does, probably better.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.