Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On 2024-05-14, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:On Tue, 14 May 2024 08:30:08 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects>
royalties:
On 14 May 2024 00:11:11 GMT, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>So, it would be beneficial to open-source developers to make sure
that their software breaks easily and crashes, so as to sell the
support.
Uh, projects with a reputation for breakage will stop being used at
all.
Clearly you have never used the stuff.
>
No, actually, you are depending crucially on it right now, without
realizing it. Without Open Source, there would be no Internet.
One thing people don't seem to understand is that most programmers,
especially "open-source" programmers, have pride! They don't want to
be ridiculed for writing garbage. They want to please their uses and
respond quickly to issue reports. Many of them are even OCD about
their code.
Only until they realize that they've made no money from it whatsoever.
Whether you want to admit it or not, those programmers who were most
insistent about supporting open-source eventually move on to greener
pastures, and produce quality code in proprietary form.
I call BS on that claim. Clément Lefèbvre (for one) has been putting out
Linux Mint for over 18 years now. It keeps getting better and Clément
shows no sign of "moving on."
Date | Sujet | # | Auteur | |
6 May 24 | cpu-x | 250 | vallor | |
6 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 74 | Joel | |
6 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 25 | vallor | |
6 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 24 | DFS | |
7 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 15 | Joel | |
7 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 14 | DFS | |
7 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 13 | Joel | |
8 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 12 | DFS | |
15 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 11 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
15 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 10 | DFS | |
15 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 9 | vallor | |
15 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 8 | DFS | |
17 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 7 | vallor | |
17 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 6 | DFS | |
17 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | vallor | |
17 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 4 | vallor | |
18 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 3 | DFS | |
18 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | vallor | |
18 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | DFS | |
7 May 24 | Linux advantage: open source (was: Re: cpu-x) | 5 | vallor | |
8 May 24 | Re: Windows advantage: quality of applications | 4 | DFS | |
8 May 24 | Re: Windows advantage: quality of applications | 3 | rbowman | |
8 May 24 | Re: Windows advantage: quality of applications | 1 | DFS | |
9 May 24 | Re: Windows advantage: quality of applications | 1 | Chris Ahlstrom | |
12 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
12 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
14 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | candycanearter07 | |
6 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 48 | DFS | |
6 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 47 | Joel | |
8 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | Joel | |
9 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 3 | rbowman | |
9 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | Joel | |
9 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | rbowman | |
9 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 42 | rbowman | |
9 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 23 | Chris Ahlstrom | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 22 | vallor | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | % | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 8 | rbowman | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 7 | vallor | |
10 May 24 | Every cult needs an apocalypse. | 1 | Relf | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | vallor | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | Andrzej Matuch | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | Chris Ahlstrom | |
11 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | RonB | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | rbowman | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 12 | Chris Ahlstrom | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 3 | vallor | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | Chris Ahlstrom | |
11 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | rbowman | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 8 | RonB | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 7 | rbowman | |
11 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 5 | RonB | |
11 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | rbowman | |
12 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 3 | RonB | |
12 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | Andrzej Matuch | |
12 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | RonB | |
11 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | Chris Ahlstrom | |
18 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 18 | DFS | |
18 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 10 | Joel | |
19 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 9 | candycanearter07 | |
19 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 8 | Joel | |
19 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | rbowman | |
19 May 24 | The almighty LLama has the final say. | 1 | Relf | |
24 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 5 | candycanearter07 | |
24 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 4 | Joel | |
25 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 3 | candycanearter07 | |
25 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | Andrzej Matuch | |
25 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | Joel | |
18 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 7 | rbowman | |
18 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 6 | DFS | |
19 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 5 | rbowman | |
19 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | rbowman | |
19 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | Stéphane CARPENTIER | |
19 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | Chris Ahlstrom | |
19 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | rbowman | |
6 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 173 | Andrzej Matuch | |
7 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 172 | DFS | |
7 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 6 | Andrzej Matuch | |
7 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | DFS | |
7 May 24 | HyperV error (was: Re: cpu-x) | 4 | vallor | |
7 May 24 | Re: HyperV error | 2 | DFS | |
7 May 24 | Re: HyperV error | 1 | Joel | |
7 May 24 | Re: HyperV error | 1 | Chris Ahlstrom | |
8 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 165 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
8 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 164 | Andrzej Matuch | |
8 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 8 | Andrzej Matuch | |
8 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 7 | candycanearter07 | |
8 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 6 | Andrzej Matuch | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 5 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | RonB | |
14 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 3 | candycanearter07 | |
14 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
14 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | Andrzej Matuch | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 155 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
10 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 1 | RonB | |
11 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 153 | DFS | |
12 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 7 | RonB | |
12 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 6 | Andrzej Matuch | |
12 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 5 | RonB | |
15 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 4 | RonB | |
15 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 3 | Andrzej Matuch | |
13 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 125 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
13 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 16 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
14 May 24 | Re: cpu-x | 4 | candycanearter07 | |
6 Jun 24 | Re: cpu-x | 2 | vallor |
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.