Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 27. Jun 2024, 23:38:14
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <crmr7j13kkdlaoj13751ek28d5e2lmrdim@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
On 2024-06-27 16:34, chrisv wrote:
 
Well, as of today:  With the Pro version, you don't need to log into a
M$ account.  You don't need to save your data online.  The keylogging
(inking and typing personalization) can be turned off.
 
The client-side scanning, we will how that pans out.  I think that
will be opt-out, too.  But I agree that they really are making a huge
data grab, and that the default behavior is fscked.
 
I'm *hoping* that the AI chips, coming soon to a motherboard near you,
will be able to be disabled in the BIOS, putting them out of reach of
Evilsoft.
>
I hope so too. I have a 10 Pro license so I don't know what the
purchased 11 Pro installer is like, but the 11 installer downloaded
directly from Microsoft would still require you to log into your
Microsoft account.


Why would the purchased installer be different?  They sell keys as a
download, with the main download page as the source.  The USB they
ship you is just a hard copy of that.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun 24 * Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back7Joel
27 Jun 24 +- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1Joel
27 Jun 24 +- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1rbowman
27 Jun 24 +- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1DFS
27 Jun23:38 `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back3Joel
28 Jun06:02  `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back2rbowman
30 Jun16:40   `- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal