Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 26. Jun 2024, 21:29:22
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <fsqo7jp4blhsk9rejhjg42pcq5981bdcnh@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2024-06-26 09:48, DFS wrote:
>
Step forward: the new Surface CoPilot computers are very repairable
 
https://www.tomshardware.com/tablets/microsoft-surface/surface-copilot-pcs-the-most-repairable-ever-ifixit-praises-microsofts-change-in-philosophy
 
 
 
 
Step back: MS removes instructions on switching from MS account to local
account when logging into your PC
 
https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/microsoft-account-to-local-account-conversion-guide-erased-from-official-windows-11-guide-instructions-redacted-earlier-this-week
 
 
There's no excuse whatsoever for making it more difficult to bypass the
use of a MS acct just to log into the OS.  If anything, using a MS
account should be opt-in.
>
Even you will have to admit it eventually: Microsoft has no interest in
users having any kind of privacy. Their optional telemetry will
eventually become mandatory, and their optional client-side scanning
will eventually be enabled by default. Using any previous operating
system of theirs which doesn't have these "features" will become impossible.
>
Whether you like to admit it or not, you too will use Linux.


Exactly, it used to be a philosophical thing, now it's just an
imperative.  There is no supported Winblows version that's worth crap,
now, 10 is too close to the end of support, it's an utter dead end. 11
has Copilot and is getting worse with every update.  You need Linux to
survive, as a desktop computer user, unless you can take Apple's ass
reaming.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun 24 * Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back10Joel
26 Jun 24 `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back9Joel
27 Jun 24  `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back8rbowman
27 Jun 24   `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back7Joel
27 Jun 24    `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back6rbowman
27 Jun 24     `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back5Joel
27 Jun 24      `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back4rbowman
30 Jun16:10       `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back3candycanearter07
1 Jul17:20        `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back2candycanearter07
2 Jul16:00         `- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal