Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 26. Jun 2024, 21:20:20
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <i5qo7jdvlu4dl2247ur7vvgo08pt3iqs9n@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

Step forward: the new Surface CoPilot computers are very repairable
>
https://www.tomshardware.com/tablets/microsoft-surface/surface-copilot-pcs-the-most-repairable-ever-ifixit-praises-microsofts-change-in-philosophy


Intriguing, not that I would buy such a device.


Step back: MS removes instructions on switching from MS account to local
account when logging into your PC
>
https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/microsoft-account-to-local-account-conversion-guide-erased-from-official-windows-11-guide-instructions-redacted-earlier-this-week
>
>
>
There's no excuse whatsoever for making it more difficult to bypass the
use of a MS acct just to log into the OS.  If anything, using a MS
account should be opt-in.


I admit I don't really see why people object so much to this, you can
just make a basically unused MS account solely for OS-related stuff, I
just used my account that I've had since before Hotmail was bought out
by M$, the one I emailed you from, but yeah I can see why removing the
instructions for changing it is annoying.  Then again, compared to
this Copilot garbage, it's nothing.  I saw an ad yesterday on X/
Twitter, propagandizing Copilot doing work for a loyal Winblows
customer, just pathetic.  If I were into AI, it wouldn't be with M$'s
built-in interface, FFS.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun 24 * Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back7Joel
27 Jun 24 +- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1Joel
27 Jun 24 +- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1rbowman
27 Jun 24 +- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1DFS
27 Jun23:38 `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back3Joel
28 Jun06:02  `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back2rbowman
30 Jun16:40   `- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal