Sujet : Re: Do Microsoft’s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 25. May 2024, 06:06:58
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lbd6f1Fnt7hU7@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Fri, 24 May 2024 23:29:21 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Remember why Vista was late: the big reason was because somebody had the
bright idea to reimplement core parts of Windows in Dotnet. This turned
to be terrible in terms of resource usage (RAM, CPU etc). So they had to
rip all that code out and start again.
Ah, .NET. MS managed to confuse that as much as was humanly
possible. .NET Framework was happily chugging along with its release
numbers, 3.5, 4, 4.8.1, when they started .NET Core with its own series
so .NET Core 3.x was a contemporary of .NET Framework 4.x. Different
animals. Then with a stroke of genius they released .NET 5.x which
was .NET Core. Framework died at 4.x.
I'm lagging a little on my Linux boxes and am only up to .NET 6. GUI
support is lagging but it otherwise works fine.