Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 08:41:29 -0700, Alan wrote:
On 2025-06-04 00:14, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>>
Nobody was disputing that Apple is a licensee of the “Unix” trademark,
and is entitled to use it to label their products.
>
This is why I like to use the term “*nix” with a meaning that has
nothing to do with the trademark, for how a system is supposed to
work. POSIX is a core part of that, of course. But there’s a lot more
to it. Linux and the BSDs conform to this “*nix” concept, while
Apple’s OSes do not.
To which "core parts" do Apple's OSes not conform exactly?
How about you go away and actually use some proper *nix systems for a
few years, then you can come back and show us how you’ve answered the
question for yourself.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.