Re: BunsenLabs Linux

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: BunsenLabs Linux
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 17. Apr 2024, 16:58:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <prov1jlgmedb5egb01huudpai63t5vq3i4@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
 
I guess it is a common issue in OpenBox,
but there was a fix — I ran its compositor (Picom) with the option
"--experimental backend" and that fixed it.
>
JHC.  Only in GuhNoo bizarro world.
>
LibreOffice also puts half-baked "experimental" and "limited" code in
their production releases, labeled as such to excuse their lackadaisacal
efforts.
>
No doubt "Picom" is still at version 0.13 after 10 years of "development".
>
This!  Is!  Linux!


The fix sounds exactly like something M$ did.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Apr 24 * BunsenLabs Linux12RonB
17 Apr 24 +* Re: BunsenLabs Linux10Chris Ahlstrom
17 Apr 24 i+* Re: BunsenLabs Linux8DFS
17 Apr 24 ii+* Re: BunsenLabs Linux5Joel
17 Apr 24 iii+* Re: BunsenLabs Linux3DFS
17 Apr 24 iiii+- Re: BunsenLabs Linux1Joel
18 Apr 24 iiii`- Re: BunsenLabs Linux1rbowman
18 Apr 24 iii`- Re: BunsenLabs Linux1Chris Ahlstrom
18 Apr 24 ii`* Re: BunsenLabs Linux2candycanearter07
19 Apr 24 ii `- Re: BunsenLabs Linux1RonB
18 Apr 24 i`- Re: BunsenLabs Linux1RonB
18 Apr 24 `- Re: BunsenLabs Linux1Kyonshi

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal