Sujet : Re: Do Microsoft?s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 30. May 2024, 12:54:24
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <rlmg5jhmke4o3pn0l74tb0c9ge30sdfbun@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Really?? Now you’re resorting to comparing it with even older, DOS-
based Windows to try to make it look good?
WinNT 4 was the same UI as 95, 98 was about the same, 2000 was somewhat
new, as was Me like it, and XP without the glued on BS too.
It's just a progression.
>
How wonderful. When is it going to be something better than a slow
progression?
Win11 is their best yet, but it's not better than Cinnamon.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.