Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 29. Mar 2024, 23:40:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <uu7cfj$hcpu$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote at 14:16 this Friday (GMT):
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 03:37:13 -0700 (Seattle), "Relf"
<Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> wrote in <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.29--3.37am.Seattle.2024>:
>
ScottGNU:
jstar is part of joe, Joe's own Editor, but has more WordStar
keybindings.
I use joe.  Just joe.
 
Are you using "Joe's Own Editor" ?
if not, please point me to Joe's homepage.
 
I rejected "vi" because it's "modal" ( what mode am I in now ? ).
I rejected "Emacs" because it's space cadet Stallman, Lisp'ing.
 
I use a _normal_ text editor, like Borland's "Turbo Pascal" & "Turbo C".
35 years ago, in 1989, Seattle, "Microsoft C" ( on Win2 ) was my
editor/IDE;
later, it was called "DevStudio", now "Visual Studio".
>
https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/downloads/
>
There is a "Visual Studio Code" for Linux.
>
What do you think of Eclipse, though?


Wasn't Eclipse shut down?
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal