Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:This "choice" bit by chrisv is a Red Herring diversion attempt, because my point wasn't about choice at all: it was about how some folks foolishly try to make claims without any objective support.-hh wrote:Exactly, I happen to think M$'s GUI is logical, and voila, Mint
>So much for fanboy innuendo that these independent developers are better>
because they don't just blindly copy what the professionals do.
So much for you not being an idiot. Ubuntu didn't "blindly" do
anything, they just made the wrong choice for their default UI. You
could still choose to run a classic UI. None of the other distros,
AFAIK, followed that lead at all.
>
Choice. What you don't get from Microshaft and crApple.
Cinnamon gives me essentially the same thing. Choice. Others want
something else. Also, choice. It's beautiful.
I'd also like to see the original statement made, because the above kinda looks like a misquote or misstatement: I've never claimed that Adobe Photoshop was an expensive waste. Sure, its expensive and it is overkill for a lot of people (usually the ones who complain about its cost), but it has been the industry's premier digital graphics tool for the better part of two decades.'What -hh said about Photoshop - expensive, waste, Gimp does the sameI wouldn't assert that GIMP is in every respect equal to Photoshop,
for free - is exactly the written position of most if not all
"advocates" on cola.' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
but I can say that I was not especially impressed with Photoshop, IFrom a learning curve standpoint, GIMP's fewer options make it shorter and thus easier & faster to grasp. For those who don't need anything more than the 80% solution, GIMP is just that: the 80% solution.
still had months left on my year of it when I deleted Win11, and
couldn't give a fuck less. GIMP all the way, now.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.