Sujet : Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
De : OFeem1987 (at) *nospam* teleworm.us (Chris Ahlstrom)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 02. Apr 2024, 14:51:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None
Message-ID : <uugv1d$36oe5$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 09:39:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
royalties:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:36:17 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
Meh. I have never found another language with the power and
flexibility of C++. Not Java, not C#, and not Python.
>
Python can do homoiconicity.
C++ can do template metaprogramming.
>
Python doesn’t need two different languages for “compile-time” versus
“run-time” programming; it uses the same language for both.
I think that Alexander Stepanov would say..... <braaaaaaaaapppppp>
Function definitions and class definitions are not declarations: they are
just forms of assignment statement.
>
And then there are metaclasses ...
I wonder if the C++ metaclass proposal ever made it into C++. Will have to
check....
-- A gift of a flower will soon be made to you.
…