Sujet : Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 10. Apr 2024, 09:01:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uv5dgn$q7om$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 08:46:03 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
royalties:
On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 07:59:04 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
royalties:
Until you realized it would never work, because classes are not
objects in C++.
:-D WTF you talkin', Willis? Ye nae true Scotman fallacy?
>
You tell me: does C++ accept “true Scotsmen” among its users/features,
or not?
C++ provides many forms of programming, including object-oriented
programming.
But no metaclasses, like Python does.
I came up with an interesting use for them, to allow convenient definition
of a hierarchy of exception classes representing return codes from a given
API. More details in the “Uses For Metaclasses” notebook in this
collection <
https://gitlab.com/ldo/python_topics_notebooks/>.
…