Sujet : Re: I Deleted Nemo :-)
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 15. Nov 2024, 02:46:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vh6968$33c17$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:19:29 -0500, -hh wrote:
On 11/14/24 7:00 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
Which is why it’s an evolutionary dead-end.
It really depends on system level trades, and lifecycle contexts.
Even as we have moved to multi-CPU machines, the amount of RAM per CPU
continues to go up over time. This is why tying yourself to a fixed amount
is going to limit the life of your machine, no question about that.
I Deleted Nemo :-)
Re: I Deleted Nemo :-)