Sujet : Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 10. Jan 2025, 03:36:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : individual
Message-ID : <vlq146$3kfpo$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/8/25 6:56 PM, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:43:15 +0000, Farley Flud wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:11:00 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>
Linux, by now, should've been and become "really appropriate" for the
unwashed masses.
>
>
Nope. GNU/Linux is not a single organized entity. It is a disjoint
collection of volunteer activity that remarkably, due to its Unix
foundation, holds together quite well.
>
However, the ongoing problem is the reluctance of hardware manufacturers
either to supply GNU/Linux drivers or to provide open specs for
volunteer developers. For this reluctance, GNU/Linux cannot be blamed.
>
The GNU/Linux user must always be willing to do the preliminary
compatibility research or else he may be unsatisfied.
>
GNU/Linux never was intended for the unwashed masses and never will be
for the unwashed masses. Success in this area would actually mean the
destruction of GNU/Linux as a superior OS.
Did you make some sort of New Years resolution about posting well-stated
observations rather than the usual insults? Please keep up the good work.
Translation: "Physfit has something that I, rbowman, intensely covet."
At least you don't have DFS's predicament. That sorry ass's emotional support in life comes from nothing other than my dick.
Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop
Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop