Re: Palemoon Browser: FOSS LOSS (was: Palemoon Browser: FOSS Victory)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Palemoon Browser: FOSS LOSS (was: Palemoon Browser: FOSS Victory)
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 07. Mar 2024, 15:02:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <lgejuidml09q69224l9sl5m1jfa1esem30@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 02:20:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
 
To be fair, that could be more of an issue with how much JS is
used nowadays.
 That's the only issue.  The web site, and not the browser,
is at fault.
 I used to do my Kroger grocery shopping with Palemoon, but
Kroger changed their web site design and now Palemoon no
longer works.  The same happened with on-line banking.
 The commercial web is experiencing a sickening race to
the bottom.
>
Heaven forbid that banks maintain their security protocols to keep your
money secure, even when that means deliberately dropping older insecure
browser versions to enforce discipline.
Heheh, yup.

But I seldom partake of the commercial web.  Palemoon works
very well with the traditional informational web sites.
 Any site that does not work with Palemoon is a site that
is not worth visiting.
>
No wonder you’re always complaining, Feeb.  You’ve become that 77yr old
uncle who only wants to use “old fashioned” stuff .. and then tries to get
sympathy when he bitches that it took an extra month to get his monthly
payment check by hardcopy forms and postal mail service.
>
BTW, Joe’s Ye Olde Electronics Repair service called:  your 33K modem’s
been repaired & is ready for pickup.  Bring cash.
Exactly, Russell is drain bamaged enough to care, obsessively so,
about how many processes are running in the background, whether a Web
site works with some obscure browser, on and on.  Just retarded.
--
Joel W. Crump
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal