Re: OT: "Congratulations, the answer you gave to problem 145 is correct."

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: OT: "Congratulations, the answer you gave to problem 145 is correct."
De : nospam (at) *nospam* dfs.com (DFS)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 10. Mar 2024, 00:00:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <usim5d$2hls6$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Betterbird (Windows)
On 3/9/2024 2:11 PM, Lonely Larry Piet wrote:

On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 09:27:18 -0500, DFS wrote:
 
# Problem 145
# Some positive integers have the property that the sum n + reverse(n)
# consists entirely of odd (decimal) digits. For instance, 36+63 = 999
# and 409+904=1313.
>
 Pfffffffft!  Total bullshit.
 This is just another string manipulation problem in disguise.
Meaning it's another bit of code you're not competent to write.

It embodies no number theoretic concepts.  None.  It's a kindergarten
exercise.
And yet you couldn't code it.

In contrast, problem 26 is a definite number theoretic problem.  The
concepts involved, like Euler's Totient function, are at the graduate level.
 But I suppose that all solutions given to #26 involved bullshit brute force --
except for MINE.
YOU didn't solve it, clown.  Maxima did.
It's just you playing with your lego blocks again.

Haaaaaaa, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
 Hail Linux!
 Hail GNU and the FSF!
 Hail Stallman!
Hew GuhNoo
Curse the FSF
Incarcerate Stallman

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Mar 24 * OT: "Congratulations, the answer you gave to problem 145 is correct."3DFS
9 Mar 24 `* Re: OT: "Congratulations, the answer you gave to problem 145 is correct."2Diego Garcia
10 Mar 24  `- Re: OT: "Congratulations, the answer you gave to problem 145 is correct."1DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal