Re: Non-Linux posts in COLA

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

I've written about this at length before.  If anyone else is
bugged by off-charter posts in cola, we could always
vote to enforce the charter.
>
Note I said "vote".  I'm not a moderator, or even much
of a leader.  But I'm motivated to say something,
and to help.
>
This morning, I attended a meeting whose theme
was "Radical Transformation".  Could that happen here?
(Beats me.)  But, should net.denizens prefer more
Linux and less BS:  as I said, I'm willing to help.
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Path: uunet!tale
From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence)
Subject: newgroup comp.os.linux.advocacy
Approved: tale@uunet.uu.net
Sender: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 1994 15:33:41 GMT
Message-ID: <D12Dw5.F8B@uunet.uu.net>
>
comp.os.linux.advocacy is a unmoderated newsgroup which passed its vote for
creation by 1337:167 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 13 Dec 1994.
>
For your newsgroups file:
comp.os.linux.advocacy  Benefits of Linux compared to other operating systems.
>
The charter, culled from the call for votes:
>
For discussion of the benefits of Linux compared to other operating systems.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _

You're wanting to netcop the topics presented in COLA?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.