Re: iconv "versions"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: iconv "versions"
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 16. Mar 2024, 23:56:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ut54i1$33m2r$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 08:54:00 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
royalties:
 
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:43:38 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
If you want to see a real morass, just look at the gettext-related
code in GNU's glibc.
>
I’m guessing, much of that would be remaining backward compatibility
with legacy pre-Unicode national character sets.
 
Time to move forward?

Maybe at some point those legacy encodings should be moved out of glibc
proper, into special-purpose utilities for dealing with historical
documents. But as long as we want to preserve records of our past, there
will likely always be a need for them somewhere.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Mar 24 * iconv "versions"47Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"3Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Mar 24 i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"36vallor
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"35vallor
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"34Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i  `* Re: iconv "versions"33Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Mar 24 i   `* Re: iconv "versions"32Chris Ahlstrom
16 Mar 24 i    `* Re: iconv "versions"31Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Mar 24 i     `* Re: iconv "versions"30Farley Flud
17 Mar 24 i      `* Re: iconv "versions"29Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Mar 24 i       +* Re: iconv "versions"2Farley Flud
18 Mar 24 i       i`- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom
17 Mar 24 i       `* Re: iconv "versions"26Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Mar 24 i        +* Re: iconv "versions"6Farley Flud
18 Mar 24 i        i+- Re: iconv "versions"1Joel
18 Mar 24 i        i+* Re: iconv "versions"3Chris Ahlstrom
18 Mar 24 i        ii`* Re: iconv "versions"2Joel
18 Mar 24 i        ii `- Re: iconv "versions"1DFS
22 Mar 24 i        i`- Re: iconv "versions"1Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Mar 24 i        +* Re: iconv "versions"16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Mar 24 i        i+- Microsoft was using "UTF-16" back in 1989, Japan.1Relf
18 Mar 24 i        i`* Re: iconv "versions"14Nuxxie
18 Mar 24 i        i `* Re: iconv "versions"13Joel
18 Mar 24 i        i  `* Re: iconv "versions"12DFS
18 Mar 24 i        i   +- Re: iconv "versions"1Joel
19 Mar 24 i        i   `* Re: iconv "versions"10vallor
21 Mar 24 i        i    +* Re: iconv "versions"7DFS
21 Mar 24 i        i    i`* Re: iconv "versions"6candycanearter07
21 Mar 24 i        i    i `* Re: iconv "versions"5DFS
21 Mar 24 i        i    i  +* Re: iconv "versions"2Joel
22 Mar 24 i        i    i  i`- Re: iconv "versions"1candycanearter07
21 Mar 24 i        i    i  +- Re: WSL (was Re: iconv "versions")1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Mar 24 i        i    i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1rbowman
22 Mar 24 i        i    `* Re: iconv "versions"2Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Mar 24 i        i     `- Re: iconv "versions"1DFS
18 Mar 24 i        `* Re: Microsoft was using UTF-8 back in 1989.3rbowman
18 Mar 24 i         +- Re: Microsoft was using (16 bit) "Unicode 88" back in 1989, Japan.1candycanearter07
18 Mar 24 i         `- Re: Microsoft was using (16 bit) "Unicode 88" back in 1989, Japan.1rbowman
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"4rbowman
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"2Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 `* Re: iconv "versions"2Nuxxie
15 Mar 24  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal