Re: iconv "versions"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: iconv "versions"
De : ff (at) *nospam* linux.rocks (Farley Flud)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 18. Mar 2024, 00:17:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <17bdad2b49eee96f$566$1351842$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
On 17 Mar 2024 21:53:30 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

 
From what I see at work, in a, not that old, Windows VM, it's still not
utf-8 by default.
>

You stupid jackass.  The Microslop default is UTF-16, which is a
very poor choice compared to GNU/Linux UTF-8.

But the fact that you did not know this only proves your total
incompetence.


>
The old
encodings had a purpose long time ago. Now, they are done and they
should stay only in museums.
>

The "old" encodings are far more common than an incompetent idiot
like you can realize.

That's why it's critical to have GLIBC include all possible encodings
for the foreseeable and not-foreseeable future.

Don't forget.  I am the expert and you are not.  Your opinion is
worth less than dog shit.

 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Mar 24 * iconv "versions"47Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"3Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Mar 24 i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"36vallor
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"35vallor
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"34Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i  `* Re: iconv "versions"33Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Mar 24 i   `* Re: iconv "versions"32Chris Ahlstrom
16 Mar 24 i    `* Re: iconv "versions"31Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Mar 24 i     `* Re: iconv "versions"30Farley Flud
17 Mar 24 i      `* Re: iconv "versions"29Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Mar 24 i       +* Re: iconv "versions"2Farley Flud
18 Mar 24 i       i`- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom
17 Mar 24 i       `* Re: iconv "versions"26Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Mar 24 i        +* Re: iconv "versions"6Farley Flud
18 Mar 24 i        i+- Re: iconv "versions"1Joel
18 Mar 24 i        i+* Re: iconv "versions"3Chris Ahlstrom
18 Mar 24 i        ii`* Re: iconv "versions"2Joel
18 Mar 24 i        ii `- Re: iconv "versions"1DFS
22 Mar 24 i        i`- Re: iconv "versions"1Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Mar 24 i        +* Re: iconv "versions"16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Mar 24 i        i+- Microsoft was using "UTF-16" back in 1989, Japan.1Relf
18 Mar 24 i        i`* Re: iconv "versions"14Nuxxie
18 Mar 24 i        i `* Re: iconv "versions"13Joel
18 Mar 24 i        i  `* Re: iconv "versions"12DFS
18 Mar 24 i        i   +- Re: iconv "versions"1Joel
19 Mar 24 i        i   `* Re: iconv "versions"10vallor
21 Mar 24 i        i    +* Re: iconv "versions"7DFS
21 Mar 24 i        i    i`* Re: iconv "versions"6candycanearter07
21 Mar 24 i        i    i `* Re: iconv "versions"5DFS
21 Mar 24 i        i    i  +* Re: iconv "versions"2Joel
22 Mar 24 i        i    i  i`- Re: iconv "versions"1candycanearter07
21 Mar 24 i        i    i  +- Re: WSL (was Re: iconv "versions")1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Mar 24 i        i    i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1rbowman
22 Mar 24 i        i    `* Re: iconv "versions"2Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Mar 24 i        i     `- Re: iconv "versions"1DFS
18 Mar 24 i        `* Re: Microsoft was using UTF-8 back in 1989.3rbowman
18 Mar 24 i         +- Re: Microsoft was using (16 bit) "Unicode 88" back in 1989, Japan.1candycanearter07
18 Mar 24 i         `- Re: Microsoft was using (16 bit) "Unicode 88" back in 1989, Japan.1rbowman
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"4rbowman
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"2Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 `* Re: iconv "versions"2Nuxxie
15 Mar 24  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal