Re: iconv "versions"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: iconv "versions"
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 18. Mar 2024, 16:18:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <19jgvi55rjvcoca9glno0ej8qfc7s3hvt3@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

WinNT is played out, save for specific needs to run apps, Linux is so
much smoother of a ride.
>
I haven't installed a Linux distro to bare metal in a long time.  What's
smooth about it?
>
Certainly not the (cr)apps.


You think I'd have sworn off my Windows license and setup if not for
good apps being available in Linux?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Mar 24 * iconv "versions"47Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"3Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Mar 24 i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"36vallor
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"35vallor
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"34Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i  `* Re: iconv "versions"33Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Mar 24 i   `* Re: iconv "versions"32Chris Ahlstrom
16 Mar 24 i    `* Re: iconv "versions"31Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Mar 24 i     `* Re: iconv "versions"30Farley Flud
17 Mar 24 i      `* Re: iconv "versions"29Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Mar 24 i       +* Re: iconv "versions"2Farley Flud
18 Mar 24 i       i`- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom
17 Mar 24 i       `* Re: iconv "versions"26Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Mar 24 i        +* Re: iconv "versions"6Farley Flud
18 Mar 24 i        i+- Re: iconv "versions"1Joel
18 Mar 24 i        i+* Re: iconv "versions"3Chris Ahlstrom
18 Mar 24 i        ii`* Re: iconv "versions"2Joel
18 Mar 24 i        ii `- Re: iconv "versions"1DFS
22 Mar 24 i        i`- Re: iconv "versions"1Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Mar 24 i        +* Re: iconv "versions"16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Mar 24 i        i+- Microsoft was using "UTF-16" back in 1989, Japan.1Relf
18 Mar 24 i        i`* Re: iconv "versions"14Nuxxie
18 Mar 24 i        i `* Re: iconv "versions"13Joel
18 Mar 24 i        i  `* Re: iconv "versions"12DFS
18 Mar 24 i        i   +- Re: iconv "versions"1Joel
19 Mar 24 i        i   `* Re: iconv "versions"10vallor
21 Mar 24 i        i    +* Re: iconv "versions"7DFS
21 Mar 24 i        i    i`* Re: iconv "versions"6candycanearter07
21 Mar 24 i        i    i `* Re: iconv "versions"5DFS
21 Mar 24 i        i    i  +* Re: iconv "versions"2Joel
22 Mar 24 i        i    i  i`- Re: iconv "versions"1candycanearter07
21 Mar 24 i        i    i  +- Re: WSL (was Re: iconv "versions")1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Mar 24 i        i    i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1rbowman
22 Mar 24 i        i    `* Re: iconv "versions"2Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Mar 24 i        i     `- Re: iconv "versions"1DFS
18 Mar 24 i        `* Re: Microsoft was using UTF-8 back in 1989.3rbowman
18 Mar 24 i         +- Re: Microsoft was using (16 bit) "Unicode 88" back in 1989, Japan.1candycanearter07
18 Mar 24 i         `- Re: Microsoft was using (16 bit) "Unicode 88" back in 1989, Japan.1rbowman
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"4rbowman
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"2Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 `* Re: iconv "versions"2Nuxxie
15 Mar 24  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal