Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
Nuxxie <nuxxie@linux.rocks> wrote:Yeah, they did. This wasn't using an interpreter, but was basically a strategy for deciding the sequence for loading & starting already compiled code, specifically not for efficiency, but for the user UI experience (aka "perceptions").On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:12:16 -0400, -hh wrote:You seem to have completely missed what -hh was referring to.
>plus also because some software vendors>
have manipulated their code to put the UI up quickly so that it looks
ready while it technically isn't yet
This is known as "just in time" compilation and is standard
practice on thst junk Microslop Winblows. Instead of distributing
binaries, like on GNU/Linux,they will package byte code and then
compile all or portions of it on demand.
>
Naked inefficiency and bloat is Microslop.
>
Only the deranged run Microslop.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.