Sujet : Re: Meson build system
De : OFeem1987 (at) *nospam* teleworm.us (Chris Ahlstrom)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 19. Mar 2024, 22:31:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None
Message-ID : <utcsnv$119e2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Farley Flud wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:38:57 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
Not strictly a Linux topic, but....
>
Yes, it is.
>
So I've used GNU Autotools for many many years (like since 2006 maybe?). But
for new project I decided to go with Meson.
>
I program only for myself and not for any grubbing corporation.
Thus, my projects can get by with just GNU Make.
Heh heh. All of my personal projects have hitherto used GNU Autotools.
A blend of autoconf, autoheader, automake, libtool and libtoolize, and of
course some m4 macros.
For one of them, I also added a qmake build process, which turned out to
be useful for building in Windows and in FreeBSD.
But my personal projects often use bash to unite various C programs
into a coherent whole. That is beyond the scope of any build
system like autotools or cmake.
You are the King of Brute Force!
Also, I am beginning to consider Tk/Tcl as a graphical alternative
to bash. A great aid in development is vtcl:
>
https://vtcl.sourceforge.net/
Cripes, the 8.6 version is 8 years old!
-- The Least Perceptive Literary Critic