Sujet : Re: iconv "versions"
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 21. Mar 2024, 17:00:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <uthi1s$2949h$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
DFS <
nospam@dfs.com> wrote at 23:58 this Wednesday (GMT):
On 3/18/2024 11:47 PM, vallor wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:06:48 -0400, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
<65f84a75$0$2130810$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 3/18/2024 8:54 AM, Joel wrote:
>
>
WinNT is played out, save for specific needs to run apps, Linux is so
much smoother of a ride.
>
>
I haven't installed a Linux distro to bare metal in a long time. What's
smooth about it?
>
Certainly not the (cr)apps.
So you haven't installed Linux in a long time, but you
make a claim about it. Do you even listen to yourself? 🤣️
>
"to bare metal."
>
>
>
Just stick with Linux Subsystem for Windows, you'll do fine. :)
>
I will!
>
LSW is a better name than WSL, for sure.
>
My 6-mth evaluation of Win11 Enterprise ends today, and I have a Win11
Pro key (2 of them actually), so that's what I'll be installing shortly.
I'm pretty sure Windows couldn't name it LSW because of some copyright?
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
iconv "versions"
Re: iconv "versions"