Sujet : Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 21. Mar 2024, 22:39:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uti5u3$2e01g$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:45:13 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
The Cakewalk Application Language (CAL) was very
Lispy.
Was it like Autolisp, in making you suffer the Lisp syntax without the
cool stuff like AST-based macros and lexical binding? In short, the worst
of both worlds?