Sujet : Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 22. Mar 2024, 04:08:05
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <l647g5F2m1hU6@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:36:35 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Turbo Pascal was better, but I really got into Turbo C.
I bought Turbo Pascal for CP/M when it first came out. How could you go
wrong for $50? I thought it was broken after the first hello world
experiment since I was used to the leisurely BDS C compilations.
I never did get Turbo C but I did get the C++/OWL IDE. I liked it and in
the early '90s it wasn't clear Microsoft was going to be the 800 pound
gorilla. I wasn't that fond of MFC but what are you going to do? In their
defense a C++ standard was years in the future so they rolled their own.