Sujet : Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
De : OFeem1987 (at) *nospam* teleworm.us (Chris Ahlstrom)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 22. Mar 2024, 14:38:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None
Message-ID : <utju4b$2tns5$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:45:13 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
The Cakewalk Application Language (CAL) was very
Lispy.
>
Was it like Autolisp, in making you suffer the Lisp syntax without the
cool stuff like AST-based macros and lexical binding? In short, the worst
of both worlds?
Dunno. I suspect Greg Hendershott used basic Lisp syntax because it was easy to
code.
-- Just because the message may never be received does not mean it isnot worth sending.