Re: iconv "versions"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: iconv "versions"
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 22. Mar 2024, 16:50:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <utk5r0$2vrj1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 18:15 this Thursday (GMT):
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
neither 'Windows' or 'subsystem' should be in
the name, since it's not actually a subsystem of Windows in any way,
shape or form.
>
Good info here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/about
>
Whatever the name, I think MS did a good job with it.  Took them a
while, but they made it really easy to use a few Linux distros right
alongside Windows, and with good performance.
>
>
WSL 2 is interesting, but not useful for production use of Linux GUI
apps under Win11, mostly for developers.  It's a cool thing to have
achieved, though, for M$.


It is admittedly cool, but in my opinion a bit undercut by Git Bash.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Mar 24 * iconv "versions"47Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"3Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Mar 24 i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"36vallor
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"35vallor
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"34Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i  `* Re: iconv "versions"33Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Mar 24 i   `* Re: iconv "versions"32Chris Ahlstrom
16 Mar 24 i    `* Re: iconv "versions"31Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Mar 24 i     `* Re: iconv "versions"30Farley Flud
17 Mar 24 i      `* Re: iconv "versions"29Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Mar 24 i       +* Re: iconv "versions"2Farley Flud
18 Mar 24 i       i`- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom
17 Mar 24 i       `* Re: iconv "versions"26Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Mar 24 i        +* Re: iconv "versions"6Farley Flud
18 Mar 24 i        i+- Re: iconv "versions"1Joel
18 Mar 24 i        i+* Re: iconv "versions"3Chris Ahlstrom
18 Mar 24 i        ii`* Re: iconv "versions"2Joel
18 Mar 24 i        ii `- Re: iconv "versions"1DFS
22 Mar 24 i        i`- Re: iconv "versions"1Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Mar 24 i        +* Re: iconv "versions"16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Mar 24 i        i+- Microsoft was using "UTF-16" back in 1989, Japan.1Relf
18 Mar 24 i        i`* Re: iconv "versions"14Nuxxie
18 Mar 24 i        i `* Re: iconv "versions"13Joel
18 Mar 24 i        i  `* Re: iconv "versions"12DFS
18 Mar 24 i        i   +- Re: iconv "versions"1Joel
19 Mar 24 i        i   `* Re: iconv "versions"10vallor
21 Mar 24 i        i    +* Re: iconv "versions"7DFS
21 Mar 24 i        i    i`* Re: iconv "versions"6candycanearter07
21 Mar 24 i        i    i `* Re: iconv "versions"5DFS
21 Mar 24 i        i    i  +* Re: iconv "versions"2Joel
22 Mar 24 i        i    i  i`- Re: iconv "versions"1candycanearter07
21 Mar 24 i        i    i  +- Re: WSL (was Re: iconv "versions")1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Mar 24 i        i    i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1rbowman
22 Mar 24 i        i    `* Re: iconv "versions"2Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Mar 24 i        i     `- Re: iconv "versions"1DFS
18 Mar 24 i        `* Re: Microsoft was using UTF-8 back in 1989.3rbowman
18 Mar 24 i         +- Re: Microsoft was using (16 bit) "Unicode 88" back in 1989, Japan.1candycanearter07
18 Mar 24 i         `- Re: Microsoft was using (16 bit) "Unicode 88" back in 1989, Japan.1rbowman
15 Mar 24 +* Re: iconv "versions"4rbowman
15 Mar 24 i`* Re: iconv "versions"3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 i `* Re: iconv "versions"2Chris Ahlstrom
15 Mar 24 i  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 24 `* Re: iconv "versions"2Nuxxie
15 Mar 24  `- Re: iconv "versions"1Chris Ahlstrom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal