Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:Same here: for Windows, everything was turnkey by IT, including the installation of all relevant Apps. All I had to do was to log in and walk through a couple of settings in MS-Outlook to link into the host computer. OTOH, if it wasn't a Windows box, it was 100% DIY, but also came with instructions of various command line modifications that IT security required...a royal PITA.
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:43:01 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>Once installed, Linux takes much less time to "get ready" than Windows>
does, in my experience. Only a ridiculous person would complain about
the small amount of time needed to install and configure a new
installation.
I think the 'get ready' time is equivalent. I've got my catalog of stuff I
install most of which are cross platform.
>
Full disclosure: I've never installed Windows since I upgraded a 3.1
laptop to 3.11 Workgroup. At work IT drops off the new Windows box or I
buy something with Windows pre-installed. My builds have all went straight
to Linux.
I recall using PKard, a third party CAC reader, during a time when MacOS didn't natively support stuff. It was learn-as-you-go, since it was up to local IT groups to decide if they were going to support anything non-Windows. Fortunately, MacOS now natively supports CAC readers again, so there's one fewer hoop to have to jump through.When IT drops off a bare metal box they leave rapidly. Linux is strictlyEvery laptop the government handed me for project usage immediately got Linux
'don't ask, don't tell' for them.
on it. The main downside was that we had to set up the CAC and handle security
updates ourselves. Me, the Russian guy, and a couple other dudes.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.