Sujet : Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 24. Mar 2024, 02:09:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utnr0j$3tl44$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; 285e616 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:08:48 +0000, Farley Flud <
ff@linux.rocks> wrote in
<
17bf8777050f5c1e$7$2218499$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:11:00 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
The second and fourth cases should both be false, not true.
In the second case (~A => B), non-prime isn't necessarily odd, and
therefore ~A does _not_ imply B, so result is false, not true.
You are reading it wrong.
This is too good not to take "freak" out of the snubbery.
Let's see what he does with this:
The second case, again, says, if a number is prime could it be even?
The answer is "no" and hence false.
Let's see if he continues with his fawning approval of
Mr. Lester-doesn't-know-his-primes, the "distro-lackey".
-- -v