Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem (was: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem (was: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem)
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 27. Mar 2024, 16:50:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <uu1bn5$2taf7$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Tyrone <none@none.none> wrote at 13:46 this Wednesday (GMT):
On Mar 26, 2024 at 4:53:07 PM EDT, "Farley Flud" <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>
This group seems to be infested with blowhards who don't
know shit.
 
Well, let's prove it.
 
I have a question, problem, issue, or what-the-fuck-ever.
 
On my standalone, desktop workstation I use PDNSD as a
caching nameserver.  (If your distro doesn't have it then
your distro is FUBAR.)
 
My PNSD config file contains the addresses of all the
Internet root DNS servers.  There ain't no way in fucking
hell that I will use my ISP DNS server.
 
Each time I boot, which, because I use a standalone desktop
workstation, is daily, I will check the Internic fundamental
"named.root" file for any changes to the root addresses:
 
ftp://ftp.internic.net/domain/named.root
 
Usually, there are none.  But lately my check has registered
changes to the date of file service only.
 
Why does ICANN report a change to the fundamental "named.root"
when only the service date has changed?
 
Huh?  Why?
>
You are such a fucking fool.   The page where you copied all of this nonsense:
>
<https://alt.os.linux.narkive.com/eviIUtfq/why-does-named-root-change-with-no-changes>
>
answers the question:
>
"The named.root file is effectively a very small ancillary piece of DNS.
As such, it's trivial to update it if / when other parts of the DNS root
change.
>
Think about it this way. You tell make to rebuild files (like
named.root) any time other source files (like the root zone) is updated.
It doesn't matter if the contents that go in the target file
(named.root) change or not. The process causes a new target file to be
created.
>
So when the root zone file is updated (new TLD, or existing TLD
nameserver changes, or DNSSEC data changes) the associated named.root
file will /also/ be updated. It's a cascading effect, even if the
contents of the named.root file doesn't substantially change."
>
When are you going to grow up?


Interesting, I didn't know that.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Mar 24 * Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem44Farley Flud
26 Mar 24 +- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1Joel
26 Mar 24 +* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem9rbowman
27 Mar 24 i+* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem3Farley Flud
27 Mar 24 ii+- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1Joel
27 Mar 24 ii`- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1rbowman
27 Mar 24 i+- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1Joel
30 Mar 24 i`* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem4Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Mar 24 i `* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem3rbowman
30 Mar 24 i  `* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem2Stéphane CARPENTIER
31 Mar 24 i   `- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1rbowman
27 Mar 24 +- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1vallor
27 Mar 24 +- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1RonB
27 Mar 24 +- Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem (was: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem)1candycanearter07
27 Mar 24 +* Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem7DFS
27 Mar 24 i`* Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem6Joel
27 Mar 24 i `* Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem5DFS
27 Mar 24 i  `* Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem4Joel
30 Mar 24 i   `* Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem3DFS
3 Apr 24 i    +- Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1Chris Ahlstrom
3 Apr 24 i    `- Re: You Have No Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1DFS
27 Mar 24 +* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem19Chris Ahlstrom
27 Mar 24 i+- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1candycanearter07
28 Mar 24 i`* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem17RonB
29 Mar 24 i `* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem16candycanearter07
29 Mar 24 i  +* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem13vallor
29 Mar 24 i  i`* I use a _normal_ text editor.12Relf
29 Mar 24 i  i +- Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.1vallor
29 Mar 24 i  i `* Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.10vallor
29 Mar 24 i  i  +- I'm no fan of Google's "One ring rules them all" philosophy.1Relf
29 Mar 24 i  i  +* Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.6rbowman
30 Mar 24 i  i  i`* Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.5RonB
30 Mar 24 i  i  i +- Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.1rbowman
1 Apr 24 i  i  i `* Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.3candycanearter07
1 Apr 24 i  i  i  `* Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.2rbowman
1 Apr 24 i  i  i   `- Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.1candycanearter07
29 Mar 24 i  i  `* Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.2candycanearter07
30 Mar 24 i  i   `- Re: I use a _normal_ text editor.1rbowman
30 Mar 24 i  `* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem2RonB
1 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1candycanearter07
27 Mar 24 `* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem4Farley Flud
27 Mar 24  +* Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem2DFS
28 Mar 24  i`- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1Tyrone
27 Mar 24  `- Re: Prove Youir Worth: GNU/Linux Problem1Joel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal