Re: A Problem To Solve :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: A Problem To Solve :-)
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 01. Apr 2024, 05:22:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <uud9a7$23l4a$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/31/24 20:15, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
 <snip old crap and random babble>
 
If the missile computes that 5 fighter jets at time t will exactly be at
these coordinates in the sky:
>
Jet 1: (4.38 km, 3.9 km, 8.1 km)
Jet 2: (5.23 km, 9.61 km, 4.74 km)
Jet 3: (6.93 km, 6.01 km, 6.88 km)
Jet 4: (8.32 km, 2.12 km, 2.5 km)
Jet 5: (2.53 km, 4.23 km, 5.82 km)
>
then answer the following 2 questions:
>
1- what would be the coordinates of the point in the sky, that the
missile with the weakest warhead needs to explode at, at time t, to
damage all those 5 fighter jets critically enough?
 It depends on the velocity, which in physics has both a direction and
magnitude, of the jets.
 
>
2- within what minimum radius of that explosion, any fighter jet would
get critically damaged at time t?
>
 And again, it depends on the velocity, which in physics has both a
direction and magnitude, of the jets.
 Jets have long been able to outrun an explosion, even nuclear given
enough lead, that is behind them.
 You also need to know the characteristics of the warhead, which is
measured in overpressure versus distance from detonation.
 
Not that you've got any intention to solve the problem (I don't think you can solve it) and you just want to be a dick as usual, still, I add for others who may be interested, that the point you're making is the business of missile's own software, and not this problem. Missile itself computes the point at which it can get just early enough and explode so the damaging effects would reach all five targets by the time t and at those five locations that the targets are, as given above.
So we don't have to change the problem to adjust for that consideration.
Now jump back in the bag where you've been for a few years now.
And to others reading it, I add a few spoon feedings:
- It's a straightforward programming problem, well within capabilities of Code Monkeys, but you need to first solve the problem, and it requires simple math at the college algebra level.
- three skills are tested here:
1- knowing the simple math
2- solving the problem
3- programming it
I doubt the #2 skill above can be found in many Code Monkeys. A Code Monkey generally cannot solve it. So that's the heart of the problem, and if you solve it you're above a Code Monkey in programming.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Mar 24 * Re: A Problem To Solve :-)76Physfitfreak
8 Mar 24 +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)4Chris Ahlstrom
8 Mar 24 i`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)3Physfitfreak
8 Mar 24 i +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
8 Mar 24 i `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Chris Ahlstrom
10 Mar 24 `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)71Physfitfreak
17 Mar 24  `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)70Physfitfreak
17 Mar 24   `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)69Physfitfreak
18 Mar 24    +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)17Farley Flud
18 Mar 24    i+* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)15Physfitfreak
18 Mar 24    ii+* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)9Farley Flud
20 Mar 24    iii`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)8DFS
21 Mar 24    iii `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)7rbowman
21 Mar 24    iii  `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)6DFS
22 Mar 24    iii   +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)4rbowman
22 Mar 24    iii   i+- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Chris Ahlstrom
23 Mar 24    iii   i`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)2DFS
24 Mar 24    iii   i `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1rbowman
26 Mar 24    iii   `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1DFS
19 Mar 24    ii`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)5rbowman
19 Mar 24    ii +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)3Physfitfreak
19 Mar 24    ii i`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)2rbowman
19 Mar 24    ii i `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
19 Mar 24    ii `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Chris Ahlstrom
18 Mar 24    i`- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Chris Ahlstrom
23 Mar 24    `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)51Physfitfreak
27 Mar 24     +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)49Physfitfreak
29 Mar 24     i`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)48Physfitfreak
29 Mar 24     i +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1DFS
29 Mar 24     i +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-) tl;dr1rbowman
29 Mar 24     i +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
1 Apr 24     i `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)44Physfitfreak
1 Apr 24     i  +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)4Jim Pennino
1 Apr 24     i  i`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)3Physfitfreak
1 Apr 24     i  i +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1DFS
1 Apr 24     i  i `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Jim Pennino
1 Apr 24     i  +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
1 Apr 24     i  +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)7Farley Flud
1 Apr 24     i  i+- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Jim Pennino
1 Apr 24     i  i`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)5Physfitfreak
1 Apr 24     i  i +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Jim Pennino
1 Apr 24     i  i `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)3Physfitfreak
1 Apr 24     i  i  +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Jim Pennino
2 Apr 24     i  i  `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1DFS
1 Apr 24     i  +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)5Physfitfreak
1 Apr 24     i  i+- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Jim Pennino
2 Apr 24     i  i`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)3Farley Flud
3 Apr 24     i  i +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Jim Pennino
3 Apr 24     i  i `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
5 Apr 24     i  `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)26Physfitfreak
13 Apr 24     i   `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)25Physfitfreak
24 Apr 24     i    `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)24Physfitfreak
24 Apr 24     i     +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)21Farley Flud
24 Apr 24     i     i+- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Joel
25 Apr 24     i     i+* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)18Physfitfreak
25 Apr 24     i     ii`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)17Physfitfreak
25 Apr 24     i     ii `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)16Farley Flud
25 Apr 24     i     ii  +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)13Physfitfreak
25 Apr 24     i     ii  i`* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)12Farley Flud
26 Apr 24     i     ii  i `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)11Physfitfreak
26 Apr 24     i     ii  i  `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)10Physfitfreak
26 Apr 24     i     ii  i   +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
26 Apr 24     i     ii  i   `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)8Farley Flud
26 Apr 24     i     ii  i    +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Joel
26 Apr 24     i     ii  i    +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
27 Apr 24     i     ii  i    `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)5rbowman
27 Apr 24     i     ii  i     +* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)2Farley Flud
27 Apr 24     i     ii  i     i`- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
27 Apr 24     i     ii  i     `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)2Chris Ahlstrom
27 Apr 24     i     ii  i      `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1rbowman
26 Apr 24     i     ii  `* Re: A Problem To Solve :-)2rbowman
26 Apr 24     i     ii   `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Chris Ahlstrom
25 Apr 24     i     i`- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1DFS
26 Apr 24     i     +- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
28 Apr 24     i     `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Physfitfreak
28 Mar 24     `- Re: A Problem To Solve :-)1Arindam Banerjee

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal