Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On 4/1/24 14:30, candycanearter07 wrote:Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote at 19:17 this Monday (GMT):>On 4/1/24 14:11, Physfitfreak wrote:On 4/1/24 14:03, Physfitfreak wrote:>On 4/1/24 14:00, candycanearter07 wrote:>Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote at 18:46 this Monday (GMT):>On 4/1/24 13:40, candycanearter07 wrote:>which sshd>
I get:
>
hydrogen@hydrogen-OptiPlex-7050:~$ which sshd
hydrogen@hydrogen-OptiPlex-7050:~$
>
as if it just ignored it.
>
>
>
Weird, probably means it's not installed..
I get the same result with command,
>
which
>
by itself. So it is something about the command, not sshd.
>
No, the command: which exists of course but requires an argument or
file. I don't know why running it by itself doesn't give error saying it
requires a file or argument.
>
It responds to command: which ls as it's supposed to. So sshd,
whatever it is, is certainly not on my system.
>
>
>
Does sshd need to be on the system for security? Or is it the sshd
itself that has provided a backdoor?
Unless you need to remote into your computer, sshd isnt /neccesary/.
>
Oh, ok. I'll uninstall the two packages then. Thanks.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.