Sujet : Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 03. Apr 2024, 09:32:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uuj0m4$3phh2$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:43:35 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
royalties:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:50:27 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
Example below. Note the capture of the function parameters.
>
We don’t call it “capture”: we call it “lexical binding”. All the good
languages do their name scoping that way.
Scott Meyers calls it "capture" and that's that! <braaaaaapppp>
I date my CS knowledge from the days of Tony Hoare, Donald Knuth and those
other greats. I don’t know who this “Scott Meyers” is, but I doubt they
were more than a snot-nosed babe-in-arms when the early compiler pioneers
figured out how to implement ALGOL-60.