Sujet : Re: Happy Nowruz
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 04. Apr 2024, 18:51:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <uumlps$4k8g$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/3/24 20:19, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 18:25:23 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
No, Christianity has a totally different root. You guys have band-aided
it with Abrahamic religions for reasons of you know what.
What root would that be? Why is Maryam mentioned so frequently, with even
a surah named after her? That's in the Meccan surat isn't it, some of the
original writings? How about Isa? Did Abu Talib spice up his Nasoræan
Gnosticism with a little Nestorianism and Arianism?
http://traditionalcatholic.net/Tradition/Information/
Heresy_of_Mohammed.html
Now had you said the Zoroastrians came from a different root and may have
influenced the Jews and Christians I would have agreed. However what's
left of them are the Parsis (Persians) in India. They got out of Persian
when the Moslems arrived.
I told you and others about it before. If you don't remember, then go read my blogs in sci.physics for full description.
Christianity was a simplified form of Mithraism. Not the "Mithraism" that Roman had turned Mithraism into. But the Mithraism that was practiced all over Greater Iran before Zoroastrians took over and fucked it up in their own styles.
Romans also fucked it up in their style.
Christianity that Iranians gave you cro-magnons to grow out of your early human nature, was too good for you as it was. Even that simplified form of it. You had to modify it to match your vile nature.