Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:26:12 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:My personal opinion on it that its currently over-hyped.
I've seen some interesting books about neural logic circuits, but circaRumelhart and McClelland's 'Parallel Distributed Processing' was the text
1980.
used in a seminar I took that summed up the state of the art. The
perceptron went back to McColloch and Pitts in 1944. It was a start but
had problems some of which were pointed out by Minsky. Hopfield came up
with the network named after him. Rumelhart and Hinton threw in back
propagation based on gradient descent in an '86 paper.
Anyway, read the current literature and you'll see a lot of what was
discussed in the '80s. The problem was hardware. Nvidia is making big
bucks producing $40,000+ GPUs that can handle all the matrix operations
involved. That sort of power wasn't available in the '80s outside of a few
supercomputers and even they might have been breathing heavy.
The other problem was the inevitable hype that oversold NNs.
https://www.skynettoday.com/overviews/neural-net-history
It may be tl;dr but if you're interested that covers the history very
well. It's telling that 'neural network' became a little toxic amid the
stumbles over the years and became 'machine learning'. Having watched the
technology waxing and waning for close to 40 years I don't know if the
current boom will become a bust.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.