Sujet : Re: Système D
De : OFeem1987 (at) *nospam* teleworm.us (Chris Ahlstrom)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 23. Apr 2024, 23:01:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None
Message-ID : <v097k1$1r6po$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:50:08 +0000, candycanearter07 wrote:
>
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote at 15:26 this Tuesday (GMT):
On 4/23/2024 12:24 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
I recently discovered this French phrase, “Système D”, where the D is
supposed to stand for “debrouillardise”. It basically refers to an
ability to improvise and adapt your way around challenges, in whatever
situation you encounter.
The opposite of that, of course, would be a rigid inflexibility, an
unwillingness to recognize that your old, traditional way of doing
things is no longer fit for purpose.
Relevance? Look at the small, but shrill phalanx of systemd-haters,
and tell me: would you say they are lacking in “Système D”? I would
say they are.
>
bwa!
>
Nice pwnage of that party-of-1 systemd-hating wackjob Feeb.
I don't get why, but systemd hate is pretty common.
>
Because it removes some of the control users have over the services run on
their system. The alternative is much worse, but they resist change in all
forms.
I don't think it removes control, it's just a more efficient way to start/stop
"services" (if you should pardon the expression).
I use "systemctl --user" for starting/stopping mpd, for example.
And of course you can, if careful, add and removed automatic "services".
-- Habit is habit, and not to be flung out of the window by any man, but coaxeddown-stairs a step at a time. -- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar