Re: The Ultimate Process List

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:

Listen up, distro lackeys.  You are about to witness the
ultimate GNU/Linux process list.
>
GNU/Linux is a simple OS -- intentionally so.  There is
no great mystery to its operation.
>
When I boot, I boot into a bash shell.  From there I can
start X Window or do other things.
>
Check out my process list immediately after I boot:
>
 PID TTY      STAT   TIME COMMAND
   1 ?        Ss     0:00 init [3]
 110 ?        Ss     0:00 /sbin/udevd --daemon
 174 ?        Ss     0:00 syslogd -m 0
 176 ?        Ss     0:00 klogd -c 3
 191 ?        Ss     0:00 /usr/sbin/gpm -m /dev/input/mice -t imps2
 197 tty1     Ss     0:00 -bash
 205 tty1     R+     0:00 ps ax
>
>
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
Wha!  Whoa!  What!
>
That's all that is required to boot into a totally
functional GNU/Linux system.
>
Heck.  I could easily eliminate the udevd daemon but the
goddamned, fucking, retarded assholes at freedesktop.org
have made libinput, and hence udevd, absolutely mandatory
for X Window.
>
Those mutherfuckers should be shot.
>
What does *your* immediate post-boot process list look
like?
>
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
FIFTY THOUSAND FUCKING LINES of totally useless garbage
is my guess.
>
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
My advice to ALL distro lackeys is this:
>
Please apply for physician assisted suicide.  It's
legal in a lot of countries.
>
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
Brother, if you are not rolling your own distro,
then please hang yourself.
>
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

<yawn>  You're a fucking moron.  It's a desktop computer, run Mint
like a normal person, geek.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.