Sujet : Re: MS is doomed... any year now
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 30. Apr 2024, 20:00:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <68c23j1p7hkh6d84aq9tgpp3rg5mf06lmv@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Simon <
SimonJ@eu.invalid> wrote:
On 2024-04-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
Simon <SimonJ@eu.invalid> wrote:
On 2024-04-29, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
>
My computer is far below the W11 specs, even if I /wanted/ to run it :P
>
I don't know if I can or not, it has no interest for me. Just to see if I could
I got Win11 in qemu but it was a project and while I have the files I don't
actually use it.
>
I had Win11 on this box, it'd have been upgradable to 12, but bleh. It
gets tiring, dealing with M$'s shit. Just having the hardware to run
the latest Winblows isn't automatically a good reason to.
>
Agreed, when I bought the latest machine I made sure it was all Linux
compatible, then they sold out and offered a free upgrade, which I took and
ended up with an Nvidia GPU, so annoyed but entirely my fault. It works well
enough but I didn't want to support them by buying it.
I actually prefer NVIDIA, even considering that its driver for Linux
is proprietary, although my reasons for that may be outdated.
Originally I didn't need a video card, I had an old 1080p monitor that
was great with the Intel CPU video, but when I got a new 4K monitor I
found the CPU video driver wasn't amazing with it. NVIDIA offered a
very basic but modern card, not too expensive, ideal for me as a non-
gamer.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.