Sujet : Re: Arch Linux upgrade
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 01. May 2024, 06:00:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <v0seo3$2v5k0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Chris Ahlstrom <
OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote at 17:21 this Tuesday (GMT):
candycanearter07 wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote at 11:38 this Tuesday (GMT):
candycanearter07 wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote at 10:59 this Monday (GMT):
I like how Linux updates often save memory.
>
# pacman -Syu
. . .
xorg-util-macros-1.20.1-1 xorg-xwayland-23.2.6-2
yt-dlp-2024.04.09-2 zbar-0.23.93-1
>
Total Download Size: 1864.02 MiB
Total Installed Size: 5641.42 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: -21.89 MiB
>
:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
:: Retrieving packages...
>
Is Windows still an ever-bloating monstrosity? I don't have to care anymore!
>
Huh, do they have better optimization used? Or is it just removing
deprecated code?
>
Does it matter?
>
Not really, I'm just curious.
>
Would have to get and read the change-log for each updated item. Bleh.
I'm going to assume it's just optimization then.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Arch Linux upgrade
Re: Arch Linux upgrade