Sujet : Re: Linux Desktop. Why No One Wants It.
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 07. May 2024, 15:36:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <v1daob$39cc6$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Stéphane CARPENTIER <
sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 07:56 this Sunday (GMT):
Le 04-05-2024, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> a écrit :
On Sat, 04 May 2024 15:28:49 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote in
<17cc52bcdcc5a36a$57923$2329237$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>:
>
GNU/Linux is a PROFESSIONAL OS. My FVWM3 GUI looks like a pro
interface,
and other WMs look pro as well.
>
Your GUI doesn't look like anything -- it's a black screen.
>
He should change the color of the background to blue. Like that it would
look like a BSOD and no one would be able to see when it's broken.
That would be painful to look at, depending on the shade.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Re: Linux Desktop. Why No One Wants It.
Re: Linux Desktop. Why No One Wants It.