Sujet : Re: cpu-x
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 09. May 2024, 01:35:07
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <3p2o3jl48sh89pc3t2bloovf7jtsbqjh7m@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
rbowman <
bowman@montana.com> wrote:
You are correct that HyperV muddies the waters enough that cpu-x in a
Debian WSL session finds a couple of extra cores the processor doesn't
know it has. cpu-x works fine on a bare-metal Linux installation.
WSL 2 as interesting as it is technically speaking is like a lot of VM
schemes, not efficient enough. If it were really as useful as real
Linux, I wouldn't have reinstalled Win11 to get it off my machine,
although it was a good time to refresh my installation anyway. But I
had its GUI working, and installed GIMP just to see what running it
under Win11 would be like.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.